Table 4.
Characteristics and behaviors of truck drivers and their wives associated with practicing AI reported by truck drivers and their wives, Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu, India, 2010
| Characteristics/behaviors | AI reported by truck drivers |
AI reported by wives |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude odds ratio (95%CI) |
p value | Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) |
p value | Crude odds ratio (95%CI) |
p value | Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) |
p value | |
| Truckers’ characteristics/behaviors | ||||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| 22–27 | 1.0 (0.5–1.8) | ns | 3.1 (1.04–9.4) | .043 | ||||
| 28–37 | 1.7 (0.6–4.5) | ns | 2.8 (1.4–5.6) | .003 | ||||
| 38–55 | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||
| Education | ||||||||
| ≥ High school | 2.7 (1.0–7.4) | 0.054 | 4.0 (1.3–12.1) | .013 | ||||
| Primary/middle school | 1.8 (0.7–5.2) | ns | 2.1 (0.7–6.5) | ns | ||||
| Illiterate | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||
| Sexual debut before marriage | ||||||||
| Yes | 1.9 (1.1–3.5) | .027 | 1.9 (1.0–3.4)a | .034 | 1.9 (1.1–3.6) | .033 | 1.9 (1.0–3.5)b | .05 |
| No | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||
| Felt at risk for HIV | ||||||||
| Yes | 2.1 (1.03–4.4) | .041 | 2.5 (1.2–5.4)c | .015 | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Quality of sexual relationship | ||||||||
| Good/excellent | 0.3 (0.1–1.0) | .058 | 0.7 (0.4–1.3)d | ns | ||||
| Bad/OK | Ref. | |||||||
| Condom use during vaginal intercourse with wife |
||||||||
| Never | 0.5 (0.2–1.3) | ns | 0.5 (0.1–1.6)e | ns | ||||
| Sometimes | 0.4 (0.1–1.2) | ns | 1.7 (0.5–5.6)e | ns | ||||
| Always/most times | Ref. | |||||||
| Had female sexual partner(s) other than wife | ||||||||
| Yes | 1.9 (1.0–3.4) | .037 | 1.3 (0.7–2.6)f | ns | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Ever had sex with male or transgender | ||||||||
| Yes | 3.8 (1.2–12.2) | .027 | 4.0 (1.2–13.3)g | .022 | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Knew HIV can be prevented | ||||||||
| Yes | 1.9 (0.7–5.0) | ns | 1.4 (0.5–4.1)g | ns | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Wives’ characteristics/behaviors | ||||||||
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| 18–27 | 7.3 (1.6–32.8) | .009 | ||||||
| 28–37 | 5.1 (1.2–22.9) | .031 | ||||||
| 38–49 | Ref. | |||||||
| Education | ||||||||
| ≥ High school | 3.1 (1.4–6.8) | .005 | ||||||
| Primary/middle school | 1.8 (0.8–4.1) | ns | ||||||
| Illiterate | Ref. | |||||||
| Condom use during vaginal intercourse with husband |
||||||||
| Never | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | .020 | 0.4 (0.1–1.1)h | ns | ||||
| Sometimes | 0.9 (0.4–2.2) | ns | 1.02 (0.4–2.9)h | ns | ||||
| Always/most times | Ref. | |||||||
| Had male sexual partner(s) other than husband |
||||||||
| Yes | 8.6 (4.3–17.4) | <.001 | 8.8 (3.2–24.0)i | <.001 | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Correct knowledge about HIV | ||||||||
| Yes | 6.2 (2.7–14.6) | <.001 | 4.9 (1.9–12.5)j | .001 | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Knew HIV can be prevented | ||||||||
| Yes | 3.3 (1.5–7.6) | .004 | 1.6 (0.6–4.1)k | ns | ||||
| No | Ref. | |||||||
| Sexual relationship control | ||||||||
| High | 0.6 (0.2–2.2) | ns | 0.8 (0.2–3.4)l | ns | ||||
| Medium | 0.6 (0.3–1.0) | ns | 0.5 (0.2–1.3)l | ns | ||||
| Low | Ref. | |||||||
Adjusted for age of truck driver
Adjusted for husband’s age
Adjusted for husband’s education status and correct knowledge about HIV
Adjusted for marital relationship attitudes of truck driver, female sexual partners other than wife, truck driver having sex with male/transgender
Adjusted for marital relationship attitudes of truck driver, female sexual partners other than wife, truck driver having sex with male/transgender, truck driver’s knowledge that HIV can be prevented
Adjusted for marital relationship attitudes of truck driver, truck driver’s knowledge about preventing HIV, truck driver having sex before marriage
Adjusted for age and education of truck driver
Adjusted for wife’s age, correct knowledge about HIV, level of relationship control, having male sexual partner(s) other than husband, husband’s correct knowledge about HIV
Adjusted for wife’s age, income, and correct knowledge about HIV
Adjusted for wife’s age and education status
Adjusted for wife’s age, education status, and correct knowledge about HIV
Adjusted for wife’s age, education status, and income