Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun;27(6):1129–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.02.017

Table 1.

Measured and kinetic parameter estimates of FRAP experiments.


easyFRAP
Model-based analysis
GFP-HIF-1α construct N t1/2 (s) Mobile fraction Diffusion coefficient (μm2/s) Bound fraction Residence time (s)
ΔN 18 0.15 ± 0.07 0.95 ± 0.04 47.1 ± 5.1 0.01 ± 0.01
wt 14 0.29 ± 0.10 0.87 ± 0.11 21.6 ± 16 0.09 ± 0.04 19.2 ± 6.3
S247D 9 0.35 ± 0.19 0.93 ± 0.03 12.5 ± 6.9 0.12 ± 0.05 15.4 ± 5.4
S247A 13 0.74 ± 0.68 0.82 ± 0.16 13.6 ± 11.8 0.18 ± 0.13 20.1 ± 6.6
wt + D4476 15 1.87 ± 2.04 0.70 ± 0.21 10.8 ± 11.6 0.28 ± 0.14 20.8 ± 6.6

EasyFRAP: values of half-maximal recovery time (t1/2) and mobile fraction for different GFP-HIF-1α constructs, processed as described in Materials and methods.

Model-based analysis: kinetic parameter estimates of FRAP recovery curves for different GFP-HIF-1α constructs. Numerical values correspond to the mean ± standard deviation of different recovery curves corresponding to different cells (N represents the number of cells analyzed in each condition).