Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;19(4):230–237. doi: 10.1089/omi.2014.0162

Table 3.

Frequencies of Genotypes of rs7754840 (CDKAL1), rs864745 (JAZF1), and rs35767 (IGF1) in T2DM Participants and Controls

            Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age and BMI)c
    T2DM Control Chi-square test Additive Dominant Recessive
SNP Genotype No. (%) No. (%) Chi-square P P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI)
rs7754840 (CDKAL1) GG 15 (29.4) 30 (58.8) 17.448 <0.001 0.014 2.32 (1.19–4.54) 0.035 1.63 (1.04–2.57) 0.057 1.99 (0.98–3.99)
  GC 25 (49.0) 18 (35.3)                
  CC 11 (21.6) 3 (5.9)                
rs864745a (JAZF1) TT 24 (49.0) 20 (39.2) 5.946 0.051 0.032 0.48 (0.24–0.94) 0.160 0.73 (0.46–1.14) 0.025 0.39 (0.17–0.89)
  TC 22 (44.9) 19 (37.3)                
  CC 3 (6.1) 12 (23.5)                
rs35767b (IGF1) GG 21 (42.0) 34 (66.7) 6.853 0.033 0.044 2.06 (1.02–4.17) 0.014 1.75 (1.12–2.75) 0.829 1.09 (0.49–2.44)
  GA 25 (50.0) 13 (25.5)                
  AA 4 (8.0) 4 (7.8)                
a

The number of T2DM participants is 49, due to two samples failed to call out the genotypes; bThe number of T2DM participants is 50, due to one sample failed to call out the genotypes; cThe logistic regression model was used to obtain the odds ratios of the minor allele with the major allele as reference group.

The p values with statistical significance are indicated in bold numbers.