Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Dec 11;39(4):620–628. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.206

Table 2.

Anatomically constrained limbic regions of interest analysis of variance results.

Group (OB > HW) Condition (Sucrose > Water)
Region L/R Volume (μL) x y z F t g Volume (μL) x y z F t g
Amygdala L 184 −30 0 −16 7.2 2.8 1.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
L 160 −20 −2 −26 6.3 2.5 1.0 208 −20 0 −18 10.0 3.2 1.3
L 144 −28 −12 −14 7.6 2.8 1.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
R 1064 30 −2 −18 10.1 3.2 1.3 184 20 0 −16 8.8 3.0 1.2
Insula (anterior) L 488 −38 0 −16 8.3 2.9 1.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
(posterior) L 472 −42 −12 6 13.6 3.7 1.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
(posterior) R 1984 36 −4 −6 12.2 3.5 1.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Anterior striatum L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Small volume correction was determined with Monte-Carlo simulations (via AFNI’s 3dClustSim) to guard against false positives resulting in an a posteriori ROI-wise probability of p < 0.05; minimum cluster size for amygdala = 112 μL, insula = 178 μL, left anterior striatum = 160 μL, right anterior striatum = 152 μL. Coordinates given in MNI space. L: left; R: right; HW: healthy weight; OB: obese.