Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Invest New Drugs. 2014 Dec 9;33(2):371–379. doi: 10.1007/s10637-014-0194-2

Table 5.

Nine responders in Randomized Phase (n=32)

ID # Age Diagnosis Stage of Disease Cytogenetic Risk Group No. Prior Regimens Randomization Arm (Cycle 1) ±No. Cycles Best Response Time to Initial Response (days) Response Duration (days)
31 57 MDS: RAEB-2 Refractory Intermediate 1* 0 14 CR-marr 50 349
34 74 t-MN Prev. Untreated Unfavorable 0 1000 7 CR 59 161
36 63 AML Relapsed Intermediate 1 1000 5 CR^ 98 59
48 69 CMML Prev. Untreated Intermediate 0 1000 6 HI-P/HI-E 28 141
49 77 MDS: RAEB-2 Refractory Favorable 2* 1000 28 HI-E^ 161 682
50 72 t-MN Prev. Untreated Unfavorable 0 1000 28 CR 41 753
51 53 AML Relapsed Intermediate 3§ 0 5 CR^ 44 99
54 64 MDS Refractory Unfavorable 1 1000 6 HI-P 91 56
55 79 MDS Relapsed Unfavorable 1 0 5 HI-P 28 91
*

Prior therapy included hypomethylating agent

§

Prior therapy included allogeneic stem cell transplant

±

Number of cycles administered

^

Response was ongoing at the time of discontinuation of study treatment; CR-marr denotes complete response in the marrow HI-N, HI-P, HI-E denote hematologic improvement in neutrophils, platelets or erythroid lineage