Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 23;5(4):477–485. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.016725

Table 3. PM, PSD, and HPD95 for models I and II.

Model I Model II
PM PSD HPD95 PM PSD HPD95
σu2 9.033 0.914 7.059, 10.449 9.897 0.408 9.123, 10.727
σm2 3.574 0.212 3.168, 3.998 3.554 0.217 3.135, 3.981
σum −4.473 0.253 −4.979, −3.990 −4.508 0.259 −5.032, −4.013
σp2 0.747 0.081 0.590, 0.906 0.765 0.079 0.611, 0.922
σw2 0.876 0.820 0.000, 2.701
σh2 2.634 0.069 2.501, 2.771 2.633 0.069 2.499, 2.770
σe2 7.055 0.223 6.606, 7.478 7.156 0.209 6.735, 7.556
λ 0.398 0.103 0.056, 0.494
v 0.204 0.207 0.012, 0.888
1 − v 0.796 0.207 0.112, 0.988
h2 0.377 0.035 0.299, 0.427 0.412 0.012 0.389, 0.436
m2 0.149 0.007 0.135, 0.164 0.148 0.007 0.133, 0.162
γ2 0.036 0.034 0.000, 0.113
LogCPO −287542.3 −287475.1

PM, posterior mean estimate; PSD, posterior standard deviation; HPD95, highest posterior density at 95%;σu2, additive genetic variance, σm2, maternal environmental variance, σum, covariance between them, σp2, permanent maternal environmental variance, σh2, herd-year-season variance, σw2, transgenerational epigenetic variance, and σe2, residual variance. Moreover, h2, heritability, m2, maternal heritability, γ2, transgenerational epigenetic heritability, λ, autorecursive parameter, v, reset coefficient, and 1 − v, epigenetic transmission coefficient. LogCPO, logarithm of the conditional predictive ordinate.