Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;5(4):629–638. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017095

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A comparison of evolutionary estimates. (A) The relative difference of MOSAICmatched vs. each component method for: (1) the number of positively selected sites, (2) the number of confidently aligned sites, and for reference, (3) the average level of conservation across all alignments. (B) The agreement between positively selected sites (1) between MOSAIC and component methods, and (2) among component methods. Fractional overlap values are plotted as Venn diagrams to illustrate the two methods being compared.