Table 4. Genetic interactions of Chd1 and His1.
| Scored Genotypes | Temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18° | 22° | 26° | 29° | |
| Chd11/Chd11; pINT-H11M/Tub-GAL4 vs. Chd11/CyO; pINT-H11M/Tub-GAL4 | 12/112 (32%) | 5/151 (10%) | 1/83 (4%) | 0/4 (0%) |
| Chd11/Chd11 vs. Chd11/CyO | 16/118 (41%) | 15/170 (26%) | 17/163 (31%) | 16/142 (34%) |
| P | 0.51 | 0.041 | 0.0086 | 0.50 |
Double-heterozygous Chd11/CyO; Tub-GAL4/TM3, Sb females were mated to Chd11/CyO; pINT-H11M/pINT-H11M males. The crosses were set at indicated temperatures. The effect of Chd1 on viability in the H1 knockdown background was scored as the number of eclosed Cy+, Sb+ adults relative to the number of all Sb+ siblings. In control crosses, Chd11/CyO flies were mated inter se, and relative numbers of eclosed Cy+ adults were scored relative to the total number of F1 progeny. Percent viability compared with the expected number calculated from the Mendelian distribution is shown in parentheses. P values are calculated by the chi-square two-way test.