Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;5(4):e006456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006456

Table 6.

Linear regression models presenting adjusted associations between depression incidence (independent variable) and baseline social support measures (dependent variables; n=354)

Nature of support Association with depression incidence (B-value, 95% CI)
Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
From husband
 Emotional −2.4 (−3.8 to −1.1)* −2.4 (−3.7 to −1.1)* −1.5 (−2.8 to −0.2)* −1.1 (−2.4 to 0.2)
 Practical −0.4 (−1.0 to 0.3) −0.4 (−1.0 to 0.3) −0.1 (−0.8 to 0.6) 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.7)
 Negative aspects 0.5 (−0.1 to 1.1) 0.5 (−0.1 to 1.1) 0.5 (−0.2 to 1.1) 0.3 (−0.3 to 1.0)
From mother
 Emotional −1.3 (−3.0 to 0.4) −1.3 (−2.9 to 0.4) −1.0 (−2.7 to 0.7) −0.8 (−2.4 to 0.9)
 Practical 0.1 (−0.8 to 1.0) −0.2 (−0.7 to 1.0) 0.2 (−0.7 to 1.1) 0.5 (−0.5 to 1.4)
  Negative aspects 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.7) 0.1 (−0.5 to 0.7) 0.2 (−0.5 to 0.8) 0.2 (−0.5 to 0.9)
From mother in law
 Emotional −3.4 (−5.4 to −1.3)* −3.4 (−5.3 to −1.4)* −2.6 (−4.6 to −0.5)* −2.8 (−4.9 to −0.8)*
 Practical −0.8 (−1.7 to 0.2) −0.8 (−1.7 to 0.2) −0.5 (−1.4 to 0.5) −0.4 (−1.4 to 0.6)
Negative aspects −0.4 (−1.1 to 0.3) −0.4 (−1.1 to 0.3) −0.2 (−1.0 to 0.5) −0.3 (−1.0 to 0.5)

Model 1 Adjusted for age.

Model 2 Adjusted for 1 and number of children, duration of education, family income, baby health, physical health and previous emotional problems.

Model 3 Adjusted for 2 and number of life stressors/events and timing of follow-up.

*p<0.05.