Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;5(4):e006965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006965

Table 3.

Practitioner-based factors for EP with lung or colorectal cancer

Authors Study design Cancer Patient group Comparator(s) Associated Not associated Evidence
Melling et al (UK, England; 2002)28 Observational (retrospective analysis of cancer registry data, and medical records review) Lung 41 EP patients (27% aged >75); 59% male 173 elective referrals with CXR (25% aged >75); 61% male 148 elective referrals without CXR (39% aged >75); 66% male Pathway—no CXR (inferred) S–
Davies et al (UK, England; 2004)20 Before and after CRC 84 preflexible sigmoidoscopy patients (30 EP); 51% male 635 postflexible sigmoidoscopy patients (165 EP); 51% male Pathway—use of a fast-track flexible sigmoidoscopy referral system (EP fell from 35.7% to 25.9%, p=0.059) I
Oldale et al (UK, England; 2000)25 Cross-sectional CRC 100 emergency admissions (50% aged ≥75); 47% male 357 elective admissions (37% aged ≥75); 59% male Practice size (GPs); fundholding status; training status S

CRC, colorectal cancer; CXR, chest X-ray; EP, emergency presentation; GP, general practitioner; I, insufficient; S–, strong–; S, strong.