Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 7;108(7):1718–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.030

Table 1.

Studies conducted on buckling behavior of MT filaments, individually or in bundles (presented in chronological order of appearing in the literature)

Critical load (Fcr) Wavelength (λ) Methods and conditions
Kurachi et al. (36) ≈ 1 pN In vitro experiment on an individual MT by optical trapping forces method
Elbaum et al. (37) 10 pN (individual MT) Micropipette aspiration of vesicles (Assumes Eulerian buckling to obtain flexural rigidity of MTs.)
31 pN (MT Bundle)
Fygenson et al. (38) ≥ 2 pN Eulerian buckling due to growth of confined MTs
Gittes et al. (27) 4–6 pN Buckling of MTs due to the movement of kinesin motor molecule
Stamenović et al. (18) ≈ 27 pN 2.8 μm MTs supported by continuous elastic intermediate filaments
Kerssemakers et al. (53) 1.2 ± 0.2 pN Eulerian long-wavelength buckling
Kikumoto et al. (6) 0.11–1.35 pN First mode Eulerian buckling
Howard (54) 5–20 pN 4–8 μm Eulerian buckling with no supporting surrounding
Brangwynne et al. (2) >100 pN ≈ 2 μm (theoretical) In vivo experiments. Theoretical method assumes an MT surrounded by elastic cytoskeletal network
≈ 3 μm (experimental)
Li (39) 232, 350, 500 pN 2.6, 2.2, 1.8 μm MTs embedded in a viscoelastic cytoplasm
Jiang and Zhang (40) On the order of 100 pN (212 pN for MT surrounded by viscoelastic cytoplasm) ≈ 3 μm (for viscoelastic surrounding) MTs are assumed to be surrounded by whether elastic, viscous, or viscoelastic cytoplasm