Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 9;6:404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00404

Table 5.

Measurement invariance of the FFMQ bifactor model across meditative experience (meditators vs. non-meditators2).

Model MLRχ2 (df) CFI RMSEA SRMR Model Comparison ΔMLRχ2 (Δdf) ΔCFI ΔRMSEA ΔSRMR
1. Baseline model (no constraints) 1791.28 (1246) 0.947 0.038 0.046
2. All factor loadings invariant (measurement invariance) 2022.70 (1363) 0.936 0.040 0.079 2 vs. 1 214.62* (117) 0.011 0.002 0.033
3. All factor loadings invariant except those for observe on the general mindfulness factor 1978.38 (1355) 0.939 0.040 0.074 3 vs. 1 185.43* (109) 0.008 0.002 0.028
4. All factors loadings invariant except all those related to observe 1943.18 (1339) 0.941 0.039 0.064 4 vs. 1 146.59* (93) 0.006 0.001 0.018
5. All factors loadings invariant except those related to observe and wording effects 1892.54 (1308) 0.943 0.039 0.060 5 vs. 1 98.32* (62) 0.004 0.001 0.014
6. All factors loadings invariant except observe, wording effects, and general mindfulness 1821.04 (1277) 0.947 0.038 0.051 6 vs. 1 34.82 (31) 0 0 0.005
*

Significant after Bonferroni adjustment.

ΔCFI ≥ 0.01; ΔRMSEA ≥ 0.015; ΔSRMR ≥ 0.03.