Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: WMJ. 2015 Feb;114(1):10–15.

Table 2. Social Marketing Intercept Results: Childhood Immunization Awareness and Intent to Immunize.

Characteristics Billboard Intercept 1 Billboard-enhanced Intercept 2 Combined Interceptsa Changeb P valuec
% Yes (n) % Yes (n) % Yes (n)
Recalled any public health messages (without prompting) 48 (202) 54 (206) 51 (408) + 0.278
Saw any public health messages (with visual prompt) 69 (202) 73 (206) 71 (408) + 0.317
If Yes, Which Messages Have You Seen:
 CHIMC take control message 84 (139) 85 (151) 84.5 (290) + 0.765
 Mock nutrition message 25 (139) 14 (151) 19.5 (290) - 0.015
 Mock water soda message 16 (139) 13 (151) 14.5 (290) - 0.428
 Mock stop bullying message 17 (139) 24 (151) 20.5 (290) + 0.131
If Yes to CHIMC “Take Control” Message, Did it Motivate You to Do Anything 47 (116) 49 (129) 48 (245) + 0.721
If Yes, What Did it Motivate Yo u to Do:
 Get child immunized 30 (54) 17 (64) 23.5 (118) - 0.109
 Call doctor 6 (54) 13 (64) 9.5 (70) + 0.196
 Ask doctor about immunization 2 (54) 16 (64) 9 (118) + 0.010
 Review immunization records 15 (54) 13 (61) 14 (115) - 0.793
 Tell someone 9 (54) 6 (64) 12 (118) - 0.540
 Believe immunizations are important for children 96 (198) 97 (203) 96.5 (401) + 0.755
a

Combined intercept shows the total combined sample (n) with the average percentage of the 2 intercepts.

b

+ and − indicates either a positive (increase) or negative (decrease) change between intercept 1 and 2

c

P values based on Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test comparisons between intercept 1 and intercept 2.