Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Dev Drugs. 2013 Jul 30;2(2):107. doi: 10.4172/2329-6631.1000107

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fat pad analysis. A) SPX-106T mice showed significantly less epididymal fat (p=9.72×10−7) than control mice. B) Retroperitoneal fat pads from each group were weighed giving a p=1.67×10−6 between control and SPX-106T groups. C) Subcutaneous fat pads from each group were weighed giving a p=1.98×10−6 between control and SPX-106T groups. Fat pads were measured at the time of sacrifice.