Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0815-y

Table 2.

Assessment of literature quality

Literature resources Randomization Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding methodology Withdrawal and dropouts Jadad score
Liet et al. 2006 [14] Yes Computer-generated Yes Yes 6/0 5
Standl et al. 2008 [15] Yes Sealed randomization envelopes Yes None 13/1 4
Akech et al. 2010 [16] Yes Randomization cards Yes Unclear 16/0 4
Van Der Linden et al. 2013 [17] Yes By means of a macro written in SAS®, version 9.3.1. Yes Double-blinded 0/0 5
Liet et al. 2003 [18] Yes Unclear Unclear Double-blinded Unclear 2
Hanart et al. 2009 [19] Yes The randomization assignment was concealed in an envelope Yes Double-blinded Unclear 4
Akkucuk et al. 2013 [20] Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear 1
Chong Sung et al. 2006 [21] Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear 1
Haas et al. 2007 [22] Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear 1
Wills et al. 2005 [23] Yes Computer-generated Yes Yes 0/1 5
Sahoo et al. 2007 [24] Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear 0/7 2
Osthaus et al. 2009 [25] Yes Computer-generated Unclear None Unclear 2
Witt et al. 2008 [26] Yes Unclear Unclear None Unclear 1