Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Mar;46(1):1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2015.00012.x

Table 2.

Gender, Cohort and Community Comparisons of Peer Context and Sexual Behavior Variables

Marginal Means and Percentages
Gender and Cohort Town
Overall Younger
Female
Younger
Male
Older
Female
Older
Male
Low
HIV
High
HIV
Number of Friends (Mean [SD])a 4.01 [3.19] 3.21 4.71 3.61 4.89 3.97 4.05
At Least One Opposite Sex Friend (%)a,b 31.3 19.6 26.6 43.1 42.4 32.1 30.7
Perceived Sexually Active Friends (%)b,c,d
    None 59.4 81.6 80.2 25.7 35.7 62.6 55.7
    Some 27.2 15.1 16.1 43.4 42.4 25.9 28.9
    All 13.4 3.3 3.7 30.9 21.9 11.5 15.4
Affiliation with Antisocial Peers (Mean [SD])a,b,d 1.33 [0.30] 1.28 1.35 1.33 1.37 1.35 1.30
Perceived Peer Norms Favoring Sex (Mean [SD])a,b 1.33 [0.35] 1.15 1.23 1.49 1.54 1.32 1.34

Sexual Initiation Between Waves (%)
    (A) Already Initiated at Wave 1 21.8 4.7 3.1 52.6 36.1 17.3 25.7
    (B) Not Initiated at Wave 2 65.2 85.0 92.9 26.4 44.8 70.3 60.6
    (C) Initiated Between Wave 1 and Wave 2 13.0 10.3 4.1 20.9 19.1 12.4 13.7
    100*(C/(B+C))a,b,d 16.6 4.8 4.2 44.2 29.9 15.0 18.4
Multiple New Partners Between Waves (%)b,d 7.3 3.4 1.9 13.0 12.7 5.3 9.0
a

Statistically significant sex difference at the 0.05 level.

b

Statistically significant cohort difference at the 0.05 level.

c

Statistically significant sex-by-cohort difference at the 0.05 level.

d

Statistically significant community difference at the 0.05 level.