Table 3.
Relative Risk Ratios and Adjusted Relative Risk Ratios from Multinomial Logistic Regression Models of Sexual Initiation between Waves 1 and 2
With | Full | ||
---|---|---|---|
Bivariate | Controls | Multivariate | |
Number of Friends | 1.02 | 1.06 | 0.98 |
Any Opposite Sex Friends (vs. None) | 1.61* | 1.24 | 1.01 |
Affiliation with Antisocial Peers | 1.20* | 1.44** | 1.24 |
Perceived Peer Norms Favoring Sex | 2.20*** | 1.81*** | 1.67*** |
Male (vs. Female) | 0.42*** | ||
Age | 1.36*** | ||
High (vs. Low) Prevalence Town | 1.69** | ||
In (vs. Out of) School | 0.57* | ||
Educational Attainment (vs. None or Primary) | |||
Junior Secondary School | 1.19 | ||
Senior Secondary School or More | 1.88 | ||
Household Composition (vs. Both Parents) | |||
Mother Only | 1.45 | ||
Father Only | 0.88 | ||
No Family Adult | 2.59** | ||
Extended Family Adult | 1.98* | ||
Other | 1.90 | ||
Household Wealth | 0.55 |
Note: “With Controls” refers to four models containing one peer context variable each, plus sociodemographic controls, and Full Multivariate refers to a single model including all four peer context variables and sociodemographic controls. Risk ratios presented here contrast resondents who initiated sexual activity between Waves 1 and 2 with those who reported being sexually inexperienced at both Waves; we omit risk ratios from the equation comparing respondents who were already sexually experienced at Wave 1 with those who reported being sexually inexperienced at both Waves.
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001.