Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Mar;46(1):1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2015.00012.x

Table 4.

Odds Ratios and Adjusted Odds Ratios from Logistic Regression Models Predicting Multiple New Sexual Partners Between Waves

With Full
Bivariate Controls Multivariate
Number of Friends
    For Younger Cohort 1.19** 1.20** 1.18*
    For Older Cohort 1.03 1.03 1.03
Any Opposite Sex Friends (vs. None) 1.81* 1.29 0.98
Affiliation with Antisocial Peers
    For Younger Cohort 1.56 1.58* 1.13
    For Older Cohort 0.99 0.96 0.78
Perceived Peer Norms Favoring Sex
    For Females 1.76*** 1.20 1.21
    For Males 2.23*** 1.79*** 1.85***
Male (vs. Female) 0.54*
Age 1.93***
High (vs. Low) Prevalence Town 1.76*
In (vs. Out of) School 0.85
Educational Attainment (vs. None or Primary)
    Junior Secondary School 0.72
    Senior Secondary School or More 0.56
Household Composition (vs. Both Parents)
    Mother Only 1.09
    Father Only 1.02
    No Family Adult 0.81
    Extended Family Adult 1.28
    Other 0.83
Household Wealth 0.77

Note: “With Controls” refers to four models containing one peer context variable each, plus sociodemographic controls, and Full Multivariate refers to a single model including all four peer context variables and sociodemographic controls. All models included interactions between Number of Friends and Cohort, Affiliation with Antisocial Peers and Cohort, and Perceived Peer Norms Favoring Sex and Gender.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001.