Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 10;16(44):24423–24436. doi: 10.1039/c4cp04158e

Table 3. Decay times of uracil as measured by pump–probe experiments in gas phase or solution (denoted by a ) or calculated theoretically using different methods, as indicated. The symbol X indicates that the relevant paper discusses that timescale without giving a quantitative time constant. Numbers in parentheses in the third block refer to Ensemble III (see text).

Setup τ 1 [fs] τ 2 [fs] τ 3 [ps] Ref.
Experiment
λ pump [nm] λ probe [nm]
267 n × 800 2.4 Kang et al. 16
250 200 <50 530 2.4 Ullrich et al. 15
267 2 × 400 130 1.1 Canuel et al. 14
267 330 a 96 Gustavsson et al. 17
267 330 a <100 Gustavsson et al. 18
262 n × 780 70 2.2 Kotur et al. 12 (parent ion)
262 n × 780 90 3.2 Kotur et al. 12 (69+ fragment)
262 n × 780 70 2.4 Matsika et al. 13 (parent ion)
262 n × 780 90 2.6 Matsika et al. 13 (69+ fragment)
Theoretical method
FMS:CASSCF(8,6) X Hudock et al. 99
SH:CPMD/BLYP 551–608 Nieber et al. 100
Doltsinis et al. 101
SH:OM2/MRCI 21 570 Lan et al. 102
SH:CAS(10,8) 650–740 >1.5–1.8 Barbatti et al. 24
Nachtigallova et al. 103
SH:CAS(14,10) X X Fingerhut et al. 104
SH:CAS(14,10) 516 Fingerhut et al. 105
This work
S0 + T1 2.4 ± 0.1 (4.2 ± 0.1) Ensemble II (III)
S0 + T1 63 ± 7 (48 ± 11) 2.8 ± 0.1 (5.2 ± 0.1) Ensemble II (III)
ππ* 30 ± 1 (8 ± 1) 3.2 ± 0.1 (2.6 ± 0.1) Ensemble II (III)

a Fluorescence upconversion in aqueous solution.