Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Jan 14;58(5):787–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.049

Table II.

Prevalence ratio and 95% confidence intervals for acne by categories of milk intake among boys in the Growing Up Today Study cohort at baseline, 1996, United States

Servings, glasses ≤1/wk 2–6/wk 1/d ≥2/d P value for test of trend
Milk types
 Total milk
  Cases/total 102/176 356/517 379/523 1019/1543
  Age-adjusted PR 1.00 1.15 1.25 1.20 .69
  95% CI 1.01, 1.32 1.09, 1.44 1.04, 1.38
  Multivariate PR 1.00 1.20 1.22 1.16 .77
  95% CI 1.03, 1.39 1.06, 1.41 1.01, 1.34
 Whole milk
  Cases/total 99/172 166/242 172/247 389/618
  Age adjusted PR 1.00 1.20 1.21 1.09 .91
  95% CI 1.03, 1.40 1.03, 1.40 0.95, 1.26
  Multivariate PR 1.00 1.23 1.19 1.10 .83
  95% CI 1.04, 1.46 1.00, 1.42 0.94, 1.28
 Low-fat milk
  Cases/total 99/172 77/110 84/123 238/360
  Age adjusted PR 1.00 1.21 1.19 1.16 .11
  95% CI 1.01, 1.45 1.00, 1.42 1.00, 1.34
  Multivariate PR 1.32 1.19 1.17 .08
  95% CI 1.05, 1.67 0.94, 1.51 0.99, 1.39
 Skim milk
  Cases/total 99/172 97/147 110/136 381/551
  Age adjusted PR 1.00 1.15 1.37 1.21 .01
  95% CI 0.97, 1.37 1.18, 1.60 1.05, 1.39
  Multivariate PR 1.00 1.12 1.29 1.19 .02
  95% CI 0.90, 1.39 1.08, 1.54 1.01, 1.40

Multivariate PR of acne for categories of intakes adjusted for age, height, and energy intake.

CI, Confidence interval; PR, prevalence ratio.