Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2014 Jul 25;23(6):618–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12143.x

Table 1.

Summary of results comparing psychiatrists who did and did not complete any buprenorphine course during residency.

Completed buprenorphine training (n=52) Did not complete buprenorphine training (n=41) P
Age 35.0 (SD 3.9) 34.8 (SD 4.7) NS
Gender M: 26 (50.0%)
F: 26 (50.0%)
M: 11 (26.8%)
F: 30 (73.2%)
χ2=5.24, p=0.022
Ethnicity W: 31 (59.6%)
B: 3 (5.8%)
H: 6 (11.5%)
A: 12 (23.1%)
W: 32 (78.1%)
B: 0 (0%)
H: 2 (4.9%)
A: 7 (17.1%)
NS
Year completed psychiatry residency
    2008 0 1 (2.4%) NS
    2009 9 (17.3%) 9 (22.0%) NS
    2010 14 (26.9%) 12 (29.3%) NS
    2011 29 (55.8%) 19 (46.3%) NS
Practice setting
    Solo practice 6 (11.5%) 1 (2.4%) NS
    Single specialty group 2 (3.9%) 4 (9.8%) NS
    Hospital-owned practice 20 (38.5%) 13 (31.7%) NS
    Solo practice shared space 3 (5.8%) 3 (7.3%) NS
    Multidisciplinary practice 8 (15.4%) 3 (7.3%) NS
    Staff model HMO 0 1 (2.4%) NS
    Sub-specialty fellowship training 10 (19.2%) 6 (14.6%) NS
    Research fellowship training 1 (1.9%) 1 (2.4%) NS
    Research 1 (1.9%) 2 (4.9%) NS
    Other 11 (21.2%) 12 (29.3%) NS
Estimated proportion of patients currently in treatment with heroin dependence (%) 7.5 (SD 19.5) 14.3 (SD 20.7) NS
Estimated proportion of patients currently in treatment with prescription opioid dependence (%) 8.9 (SD 10.4) 14.9 (SD 19.5) NS
Buprenorphine course taken (some residents took more than one course) H&H course: 22 (33.3%)
On-line course: 13 (25.5%)
8-hour course: 21 (40.3%)
None N/A
Prescribed buprenorphine in residency under supervision 13 (25.0%) 0 N/A
Currently prescribing 20 (38.5%) N/A N/A
Listed on SAMHSA site 13 (25.0%) N/A N/A
Attitudes (number of respondents reporting either “strongly agree” or “agree”)
I am confident in my ability to treat opioid addiction 44 (84.6%) 19 (46.3%) χ2=9.57, p<0.001
I had no intention of prescribing buprenorphine before the training 16 (30.8%) N/A N/A
My residency training prepared me adequately to treat patients with opioid addiction 30 (57.7%) 19 (46.3%) NS
Opioid addiction is a treatable illness 51 (98.1%) 31 (75.6%) Fisher's, p<0.05
Buprenorphine maintenance is an effective treatment for opioid addiction 51 (98.1%) 31 (75.6%) Fisher's, p<0.05
Buprenorphine diversion is a significant problem 33 (63.5%) 25 (61.0%) NS
Patients on buprenorphine maintenance are not really in recovery 4 (7.7%) 4 (9.8%) NS
Detoxification should be attempted before maintenance treatment 17 (32.7%) 21 (51.2%) χ2=4.81, p<0.05
Buprenorphine training should be offered to all psychiatry residents 52 (100.0%) 33 (80.5%) Fisher's, p<0.05
The buprenorphine training made me more confident about treating opioid addiction 49 (94.2%) N/A N/A
Barriers to prescribing
Lack of training in treating opioid addiction 8 (15.4%) 15 (36.5%) χ2=5.54, p=0.019
No supervision from experienced mentors 14 (26.9%) 14 (34.2%) NS
Do not believe the effectiveness of buprenorphine 1 (1.9%) 3 (7.3%) NS
Worried about patients overdosing on buprenorphine 0 2 (4.9%) NS
Do not want to attract patients with opioid addiction to my office 8 (15.4%) 14 (34.2%) χ2=4.46, p=0.035
Worried about patients becoming addicted to buprenorphine 3 (5.8%) 3 (7.3%) NS
Patient demand for buprenorphine too low 1 (1.9%) 7 (17.1%) χ2=7.18, p=0.007
Concerns about patients diverting buprenorphine 8 (15.4%) 15 (36.6%) χ2=5.54, p=0.019
Concerns about DEA visits 4 (7.7%) 2 (4.9%) NS
Lack of counseling support 16 (30.8%) 10 (24.4%) NS
Logistical problems of setting up buprenorphine practice 26 (50.0%) 21 (51.2%) NS
Lack of organizational and institutional support 16 (30.8%) 13 (31.7%) NS
High cost of providing buprenorphine 2 (3.9%) 4 (9.8%) NS
Difficulty with reimbursement 4 (7.7%) 3 (7.3%) NS