Table 2.
Pearson and Spearman Correlations between Toenail Metal Levels at Baseline Data Collection
| i. Pearson Correlation Coefficients Prob > ∣r∣ under H0: Rho=0 | |||||
| Ni | Pb | Cd | Mn | As | |
| Ni | 1 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| 0.10 | 0.03* | 0.36 | 0.21 | ||
| Pb | 1 | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.27 | |
| 0.02* | 0.17 | 0.20 | |||
| Cd | 1 | 0.52 | 0.25 | ||
| 0.01* | 0.23 | ||||
| Mn | 1 | 0.27 | |||
| 0.19 | |||||
| As | 1 | ||||
|
| |||||
|
ii. Spearman Correlation Coefficients
Prob > ∣r∣ under H0: Rho=0 | |||||
| Ni | Pb | Cd | Mn | As | |
| Ni | 1 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.10 | 0.16 | ||
| Pb | 1 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.39 | |
| 0.01* | 0.04* | 0.06 | |||
| Cd | 1 | 0.58 | 0.31 | ||
| <0.01* | 0.13 | ||||
| Mn | 1 | 0.32 | |||
| 0.12 | |||||
| As | 1 | ||||
Toenail metal levels were log-transformed to obtain normal distributions
p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant