Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 7;466(4):363–373. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1719-6

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of 11q13 amplification for nodal status in OSCC

Study Nodal metastasisa Threshold for amplification Amplification OR (95 % CI) p value NPV (%) PPV (%) AC (%) SE SP
Hanken et al. 117/255, 46 % G/C ratio >2.0 69/255, 27 % 1.66 (0.95–2.90) 0.074 57 55 57 32 77
Yoshioka et al. 15/25, 60 % G/C ratio >1.12 13/25, 52 % 1.14 (0.23–5.67) 0.870 42 62 52 53 50
Sugahara et al. 22/54, 41 % G/C ratio >1.5 in ≥3 genes 14/54, 26 % 5.83 (1.52–22.33) 0.010 70 71 70 45 88
Pathare et al. 54/97, 56 % G/C ratio >1.25 40/97, 41 % 1.35 (0.60–3.06) 0.473 47 60 53 44 63
Michikawa et al. 53/127, 42 % G/C ratio >1.2 and gene/cell ratio >3 43/127, 34 % 2.78 (1.30–5.92) 0.008 67 58 64 47 76
Mahdey et al. 27/50, 54 % G/C ratio >2.0 36/50, 72 % 1.87 (0.54–6.51) 0.327 57 58 58 78 35
Prapinjumrune et al. 13/30, 43 % G/C ratio >1.5 13/30, 43 % 0.70 (0.16–3.05) 0.638 53 38 47 38 53
Myo et al. 17/45, 38 % >20 % of 100 cells ≥3 spots 15/45, 33 % 20 (4.09–97.90) <0.001 83 80 82 71 89
Fujii et al. 14/23, 61 % >20 % of 100 cells ≥3 spots 13/23, 57 % 0.50 (0.09–2.84) 0.434 30 54 43 50 33

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, G/C gene/chromosome, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, AC accuracy, SE sensitivity, SP specificity

aHistologically proven nodal metastasis