Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;15:307. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1659-8

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of prevalence and management of cardiovascular risk factors in Portuguese migrants relative to Portuguese who remained in Portugal

Porto Lausanne Prevalence rate ratio p-value Adjusting for gender, age, educational level and
Current smoking 391 (25.5) 110 (28.4) 0.92 (0.71 - 1.18) 0.49 None
Anthropometry
 Obesity 358 (23.4) 74 (19.1) 0.78 (0.59 - 1.04) 0.09 Smoking
 Abdominal obesity 475 (30.6) 81 (20.9) 0.81 (0.62 - 1.05) 0.11 Smoking
Blood pressure
 Hypertension 613 (39.6) 91 (23.5) 0.82 (0.64 - 1.06) 0.13 Obesity; abdominal obesity
 Treated 320 (52.2) 33 (36.3) 0.98 (0.66 - 1.46) 0.93 Obesity; abdominal obesity
 Controlled 107 (33.4) 12 (36.4) 0.97 (0.49 - 1.91) 0.93 Obesity; abdominal obesity
Blood lipids
 Hypercholesterolemia 1119 (72.2) 228 (58.8) 0.88 (0.75 - 1.04) 0.14 Obesity; abdominal obesity
 Treated 128 (11.4) 26 (11.4) 1.91 (1.15 - 3.19) 0.01 Obesity; abdominal obesity
 Controlled 35 (27.3) 16 (61.5) 3.98 (1.59 - 9.99) 0.003 Obesity; abdominal obesity
Glycemic status
 Diabetes 93 (6.0) 15 (3.9) 0.92 (0.49 - 1.73) 0.80 Obesity; abdominal obesity
 Treated 64 (68.8) 11 (73.3) 1.51 (0.70 - 3.25) 0.30 Obesity; abdominal obesity

Results are expressed as number of participants (percentage) and as prevalence rate ratio and (95% confidence interval) of Portuguese migrants versus Portuguese who remained in Portugal. Statistical analysis by Poisson regression adjusting for gender, age, educational level and other covariates as indicated.