Table 3.
Multi logistic regression model between social support and depression
| Participants’ characteristics | Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P | OR (95%CI) | P | OR (95%CI) | P | |
| Perceived social support | 0.90 (0.86-0.94) | 0.00 | 0.90 (0.86-0.94) | 0.00 | 0.94 (0.89-0.99) | 0.01 |
| Social interaction | ---- | ---- | 0.97 (0.88-1.06) | 0.48 | 0.98 (0.89-1.08) | 0.67 |
| Instrumental social support | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 0.94 (0.87-0.97) | 0.002 |
| Controlling factors | ||||||
| Perceived household income | 1.63 (1.34-1.98) | 0.00 | 1.62 (1.34-1.97) | 0.00 | 1.64 (1.34-2.00) | 0.00 |
| Perceived health status | 1.87 (1.56-2.24) | 0.00 | 1.87 (1.56-2.24) | 0.00 | 1.87 (1.56-2.24) | 0.00 |
| Age | 0.90 (0.71-1.13) | 0.36 | 0.89 (0.70-1.12) | 0.32 | 0.88 (0.70-1.11) | 0.28 |
| Education | 1.09 (0.87-1.36) | 0.46 | 1.10 (0.88-1.38) | 0.40 | 1.10 (0.88-1.38) | 0.42 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single* | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| Married | 0.82 (0.56-1.21) | 0.32 | 0.82 (0.56-1.21) | 0.32 | 0.81 (0.55-1.20) | 0.30 |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Agriculture work* | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| Non-agriculture work | 0.81 (0.44-1.50) | 0.51 | 0.82 (0.45-1.51) | 0.52 | 0.84 (0.46-1.54) | 0.57 |
| Homemakers/students | 0.77 (0.51-1.16) | 0.21 | 0.77 (0.51-1.16) | 0.21 | 0.76 (0.50-1.16) | 0.20 |
| Unemployed | 1.32 (0.84-2.07) | 0.24 | 1.31 (0.83-2.06) | 0.24 | 1.34 (0.85-2.11) | 0.21 |
| Constant | 0.023 | 0.00 | 0.028 | 0.00 | 0.032 | 0.00 |
| Omnibus tests of model coefficients | ||||||
| Model Chi-square | 169.2 | 0.00 | 169.7 | 0.00 | 178.6 | 0.00 |
| Hosmer-Lemeshow Test (χ 2) | 11.6 | 0.17 | 11.9 | 0.16 | 13.8 | 0.09 |
Note. The analysis included 1826 cases. *Reference group.