Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;15:212. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1206-0

Table 5.

Odds ratios for association between cotton and wool dust ever exposure and lung cancer in two studies in Montreal, stratified by histological type of lung cancer

Exposure group Study 1 Study 2 Pooled
Population controls Cancer controls All controls, weighted Males Females Population controls
na ORb(95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) n OR (95% CI) n OR (95% CI) n OR (95% CI)
Cotton dust
 Squamous 23 1.2 (0.6-2.3) 0.8 (0.5-1.3) 1.0 (0.6-1.6) 37 1.3 (0.8-2.0) 19 0.9 (0.4-1.7) 79 1.1 (0.8-1.5)
 Small cell 7 0.8 (0.3-2.2) 0.6 (0.2-1.0) 0.7 (0.3-1.5) 16 1.2 (0.6-2.5) 30 1.1 (0.5-2.3) 53 1.2 (0.8-1.8)
 Adenocarcinoma 21 2.7 (1.4-5.3) 1.7 (1.0-2.9) 2.1 (1.2-3.7) 46 1.9 (1.2-3.0) 61 1.2 (0.7-1.8) 128 1.6 (1.2-2.2)
Wool dust
 Squamous 14 1.1 (0.5-2.4) 0.6 (0.3-1.2) 0.8 (0.4-1.6) 13 0.6 (0.3-1.3) 6 0.7 (0.3-2.2) 33 0.8 (0.5-1.2)
 Small cell 7 1.1 (0.4-3.2) 0.8 (0.4-1.9) 1.0 (0.4-2.3) 6 0.8 (0.3-2.0) 7 0.8 (0.3-2.6) 20 0.9 (0.5-1.6)
 Adenocarcinoma 12 2.2 (1.0-4.9) 1.3 (0.7-2.5) 1.6 (0.8-3.2) 22 1.4 (0.8-2.5) 24 1.2 (0.6-2.4) 58 1.4 (1.0-2.0)

a n = number of exposed cases.

b OR refers to odds ratio, adjusted for: age, ethnicity (French Canadian or other), years of education (0-7, 8-12 or 13+), familial financial situation during childhood (difficult, intermediate or comfortable), proxy respondent (yes or no), cumulative smoking index (CSI), and any occupational exposure to asbestos, chromium, nickel or silica. Pooled results are additionally adjusted for study.