Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
Recurrence of shock | |||||
RCT 4-armed trial |
50 Vietnamese children aged 5–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Median recurrence of shock
1 episode with sodium chloride (crystalloid regimen) 1 episode with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) 1 episode with dextran 70 (colloid regimen) 1 episode with gelafundin (colloid regimen) |
Difference among groups P = 0.46 |
Not significant | |
RCT |
222 Vietnamese children, aged 1–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Recurrence of shock
20/81 (25%) with crystalloid regimens (sodium chloride or Ringer’s lactate) 24/90 (27%) with colloid regimens (dextran 70 or gelafundin) |
RR 1.02 95% CI 0.56 to1.85 |
Not significant | |
Duration of shock | |||||
RCT 4-armed trial |
50 Vietnamese children aged 5–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Mean duration in shock
1.5 hours with sodium chloride (crystalloid regimen) 5.0 hours with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) 2.8 hours with dextran 70 (colloid regimen) 7.0 hours with gelafundin (colloid regimen) |
Difference among groups P = 0.36 |
Not significant | |
Fluid requirements | |||||
RCT 4-armed trial |
50 Vietnamese children aged 5–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Requirement for further fluid infusions
between the 2-hour infusion and full recovery from shock
with sodium chloride (crystalloid regimen) with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) with dextran 70 (colloid regimen) with gelafundin (colloid regimen) |
The RCT found no significant difference among groups in requirement for further infusions of crystalloids (P = 0.16) or colloids (P = 0.70) between the 2-hour infusion and full recovery from shock (recovery from shock was defined as a pulse pressure of at least 20 mmHg) |
Not significant | |
RCT 4-armed trial |
222 Vietnamese children, aged 1–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Proportion requiring further infusions
after the first hour
17/56 (30%) with sodium chloride (crystalloid regimen) 20/55 (36%) with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) 17/55 (31%) with dextran 70 (colloid regimen) 15/56 (27%) with gelafundin (colloid regimen) |
Difference among groups P = 0.75 |
Not significant | |
RCT 4-armed trial |
222 Vietnamese children, aged 1–15 years with dengue shock syndrome |
Total volume of fluid infused
until full recovery from shock
with sodium chloride (crystalloid regimen) with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) with dextran 70 (colloid regimen) with gelafundin (colloid regimen) |
Difference among groups P = 0.95 |
Not significant | |
RCT 3-armed trial |
383 Vietnamese children aged 2–15 with moderately severe dengue shock syndrome (moderate severity: pulse pressure >10 mmHg and up to 20 mmHg) |
Proportion of children who needed rescue fluids
40/128 (31%) with Ringer’s lactate (crystalloid regimen) 31/126 (25%) with 6% dextran 70 (colloid regimen) 43/129 (33%) with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (colloid regimen) |
Difference among groups P = 0.28 The RCT also found no significant difference between Ringer’s lactate and either of the colloid solutions in the proportion of children who required rescue colloid (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.78–1.47; P = 0.65; absolute numbers not reported); see Further information on studies |
Not significant |