. 2015 Mar 27;3(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3709

Table 5.

Group characteristics (social, economic, and the usefulness of the CIMIDx prototype for the two user groups).

Characteristics	Category	Users (n=97)		Significance (P)^c
		Use of CIMIDx by low user (n=44)	Use of CIMIDx by high user (n=53)
		mean (SD) or n (%)	mean (SD) or n (%)
Age (years)		22 (22.6)	26.5 (31.8)	.89^a
Time since diagnosis (years)		22 (24.0)	26.5 (33.2)	.89^a
Annual household income (INR)
	<1,00,000	4 (9.1)	6 (11.3)	.78^b
	1,00,000-2,70,000	11 (25.0)	12 (22.6)	.48^b
	>2,70,000	29 (66.0)	35 (66.0)	.89^b
Education
	Grades <12	5 (11.4)	8 (15.1)	.93^b
	Grades 13-15	8 (18.2)	11 (20.7)	.96^b
	Grades >15	31 (70.5)	34 (64.2)	.86^b
Ease of navigation
	Good	39 (88.6)	51 (96.2)	.89^b
	Average	5 (11.4)	2 (3.7)	.81^b
Organization of information
	Good	41 (93.2)	49 (92.5)	.77^b
	Average	3 (6.8)	4 (7.5)	.81^b
Usefulness
	Good	42 (95.5)	51 (96.2)	.77^b
	Average	1 (2.3)	2 (3.7)	.39^b
User friendliness
	Good	43 (97.7)	52 (98.1)	.31^b
	Average	1 (2.3)	1 (1.9)	.99^b
Overall satisfaction
	Good	42 (95.5)	52 (98.1)	.31^b
	Average	2 (4.5)	1 (1.9)	.39^b

^a t test

^bPearson chi-square test

^cFrom the interviews at various medical colleges and hospitals in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, May 2013 to April 2014, regarding the cloud-based system support intelligent medical image diagnosis prototype used for breast health issues, the P values were calculated with t tests for the means, and the Pearson chi-Square tests for the percentages.