Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 14;48(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40659-015-0003-1

Table 3.

Nitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging potential of the different plant extracts

NO inhibition (%)
Concentrations samples (μg/mL) 25 50 75 150 300
AEE 28.02 ± 1.36a 38.39 ± 2.86a 54.62 ± 0.09a 72.44 ± 0.10a 79.61 ± 0.00a
AEH 19.45 ± 0.55b 26.49 ± 0.12b 41.92 ± 1.12b 59.69 ± 0.34b 63.07 ± 0.51b
AFE 29.71 ± 0.18a 41.22 ± 0.39a 57.75 ± 0.18c 69.87 ± 1.07c 76.37 ± 0.26c
AFH 10.66 ± 0.27d 31.69 ± 0.14c 41.97 ± 1.70b 55.27 ± 0.96d 62.89 ± 2.31b
Vit C 35.23 ± 0.22e 44.03 ± 0.64d 69.47 ± 0.18d 73.26 ± 0.41a 85.90 ± 0.01d

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. In the same colon the values affected with different letter (a - e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. AFE: M. myristica (Leaves) ethanolic extract; AEH: M. myristica (Barks) hydroethanolic extract; AEE: M. myristica (Barks) ethanolic extract; AFH: M. myristica (Leaves) hydroethanolic extract; VIT C = Vitamin C.