. 2015 Mar 14;48(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40659-015-0003-1

Table 4.

ABTS radical scavenging potential of the different plant extracts

ABTS inhibition (%)
Concentrations samples (μg/mL)	25	50	75	150	300
AEE	18.52 ± 0.56^a	20.43 ± 1.30^a	38.93 ± 0.55^a	50.83 ± 0.61^a	63.86 ± 0.05^a
AEH	11.83 ± 1.25^b	17.20 ± 0.26^b	36.19 ± 0.62^b	52.46 ± 0.23^a	63.12 ± 0.45^a
AFE	15.13 ± 0.42^c	20.56 ± 1.02^a	37.76 ± 0.37^a	55.33 ± 2.18^b	67.84 ± 0.37^b
AFH	10.88 ± 0.26^b	13.87 ± 0.05^c	32.34 ± 1.29^c	46.18 ± 1.07^c	57.11 ± 0.38^c
Vit C	31.22 ± 0.23^d	37.46 ± 1.36^d	54.75 ± 1.23^d	70.16 ± 1.50^d	83.99 ± 1.73^d

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. In the same colon the values affected with different letter (a - e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. AFE: M. myristica (Leaves) ethanolic extract; AEH: M. myristica (Barks) hydroethanolic extract; AEE: M. myristica (Barks) ethanolic extract; AFH: M. myristica (Leaves) hydroethanolic extract; VIT C = Vitamin C.