Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(0):S40–S46. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.024

Table 4.

Among users of the HIT system, HIT demonstrated potential to increase vaccine initiation

Control Group Intervention Group Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Number who had a regular clinic visit Initiation Rate Number Who Used the HIT System Initiation Rate
HIT
 Girls 652 9.8% 21 28.6% 3.3 (1.2, 8.8)* 3.2 (1.3, 8.5)*
 Boys 775 12.9% 37 32.4% 3.2 (1.5, 6.6)* 2.9 (1.3, 6.3)*
HIT and Postcards
 Girls 320 7.8% 11 36.4% 5.9 (1.6, 21.8)* 7.2 (1.6, 31.5)*
 Boys 405 12.1% 22 27.3% 2.8 (1.0, 7.7)* 2.8 (1.0, 8.2)

Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and program type.

*

95% confidence interval indicates statistically significant differences between intervention arms.