Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Aug 23;21(4):547–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.06.015

Table 1.

Assessment of study quality using modified REMARK recommendationsa

Study quality question/Item Marquardt et al., 2005 [26] Montaner et al., 2006 [28] Song et al., 2010 [29] Winbeck et al., 2002 [27] Rajeshwar et al., 2012 [21]
1. Was the study prospective? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
2. Was the evaluation of prognostic marker blinded to patient outcome? Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes
3. Was there a defined time period during which patients were enrolled? No No Yes No Yes
4. Were there precisely defined clinical outcomes at the beginning of the study? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
5. Did the study provide a rational for sample size? No No No No No
6. Did the study provide a list of candidate variables? N/Ab N/Ab N/Ab Yes Yes
7. Were the methods for measuring the prognostic marker adequately described and referenced? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
8. Were patients unselected/unbiased? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
a

Adapted from McShane et al.22 and Whiteley et al.23

b

Study did not use multivariate modeling.

N/A = not available.