Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 19;16(3):6402–6418. doi: 10.3390/ijms16036402

Table 5.

Energy decomposition analysis (EDA) results of the H3SiNgNSi and HSiNgNSi molecules studied at the revPBE-D3/TZ2P//MP2/def2-QZVPPD level. All of the energy terms are in kcal/mol.

Compounds Fragments ΔEint ΔEpauli ΔEelstat ΔEorb ΔEdisp
H3SiXeNSi [H3Si] + [XeNSi] −46.0 210.4 −82.0 (32.0%) −172.6 (67.3%) −1.7 (0.7%)
[H3SiXe]+ + [NSi] −128.1 111.6 −159.4 (66.5%) −78.6 (32.8%) −1.7 (0.7%)
H3SiRnNSi [H3Si] + [RnNSi] −49.9 198.8 −80.0 (32.2%) −166.9 (67.1%) −1.8 (0.7%)
[H3SiRn]+ + [NSi] −132.9 113.0 −166.6 (67.7%) −77.4 (31.5%) −1.9 (0.8%)
HSiXeNSi [HSi] + [XeNSi] −37.8 169.6 −51.0 (24.6%) −155.4 (74.9%) −1.0 (0.5%)
[HSiXe]+ + [NSi] −120.4 103.4 −148.0 (66.2%) −74.0 (33.1%) −1.7 (0.8%)
HSiRnNSi [HSi] + [RnNSi] −41.0 163.9 −50.9 (24.8%) −153.0 (74.7%) −1.1 (0.5%)
[HSiRn]+ + [NSi] −123.7 105.3 −154.4 (67.4%) −72.7 (31.7%) −1.9 (0.8%)

(The percentage values within the parentheses show the contribution towards the total attractive interaction ΔEelstat + ΔEorb + ΔEdisp).