Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 10;15:346. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1719-0

Table 4.

Bivariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards model of incident TB among HIV infected individuals on pre-ART follow-up in, JUSH, 2013, N = 584

Variables Category Crude hazard ratio (95% CI) ¥ Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)
Age group (years) 15-29 1.00
30-39 0.88 (0.48 1.62)
39+ 0.38 (0.15 0.98)*
Sex (N = 587) Female 1.00
Male 0.61 (0.35 1.06)
Marital status Never married 1.00
Married 0.56 (0.28 1.12)
Separated 0.83 (0.29 2.35)
Divorced 0.72 (0.27 1.91)
Widowed 0.23 (0.05 1.02)
Level of education (N = 585) Primary 1.00
No education 1.85 (0.95 3.63)
Secondary 1.38 (0.67 2.85)
Tertiary 0.63 (0.15 2.74)
People per household (N = 583) <=2 1.00
>2 1.54 (0.76 3.09)
Tobacco use Yes 1.00
No 0.66 (0.35 1.25)
Alcohol use Yes 1.00
No 0.68 (0.37 1.23)
Past opportunistic infection (N = 587) No 1.00 1.00
Yes 2.57 (1.43 4.61)** 2.41 (1.33 4.34)
WHO clinical stage Stage I/ II 1.00 1.00
Stage III/ IV 3.39 (1.90 6.02)** 3.05 (1.61 5.81)**
Functional status Working 1.00
Ambulatory 1.29 (0.58 2.88)
Bedridden 5.65 (0.77 41.32)
IPT prophylaxis® Yes 1.00 1.00
No 1.95 (1.02 3.74) 2.02 (1.04 3.92)*
CD 4 + cells count (cells/μl) (N = 585) > = 500 1.00 1.00
350 – 499 3.06 (1.47 6.37)** 2.87 (1.37 6.03)**
<350 2.34 (1.02 5.39)* 3.16 (1.04 3.92)**

*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 **statistically significant at p ≤ 0.01.

®Exchanging the reference at adjusted level of analysis results in (aHR = 0.5).

¥Global test of proportional-hazards assumption for predictors fitted to Cox proportional hazard model was not significant (df = 5, ch2 = 7.04, p = 0.218).