Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 6;6(2):133–142. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12306

Table 1.

Study design choices and effect parameter assumptions for the two example studies

Example study Study variable Simulated values
Tick burden survey No of locations 10, 20, 50, 100, 200
No of broods per location 2
No of chicks per brood 3
Mean tick burden per chick, Inline graphic 1, 5, 10
Location-level variance, Inline graphic 0, 1
Brood-level variance, Inline graphic 0, 0·7
Chick-level variance, Inline graphic 0, 0·3
LLIN trial No of rotations of the Latin square 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
No of huts, No of nets, No of weeks per rotation 6
No of A. gambiae entering each hut each night, nijk 5, 25
Mortality using the control net, Inline graphic 70%
Minimum acceptable mortality using LLIN type E1, Inline graphic(odds ratio, Inline graphic) 80% (1·7)
Mortality assumed using the four secondary LLINs (odds ratio) 80% (1·7)
Between-hut and -week variances, Inline graphic 0, 0·5
Observation-level (overdispersion) variance, Inline graphic 0, 0·5, 1