TABLE 5.
Numbers and proportions of discordant MIC results among paired isolates obtained from patients with concurrent rectal and urethral infections (n = 45)
Discordant resultsa | No. (%) |
---|---|
Discordant azithromycin MIC results | 2 (4.4) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 0 |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 2 (4.4) |
Discordant cefixime MIC results | 3 (6.7) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 2 (4.4) |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 1 (2.2) |
Discordant ceftriaxone MIC results | 2 (4.4) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 2 (4.4) |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 0 |
Discordant ciprofloxacin MIC results | 5 (11.1) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 4 (8.9) |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 1 (2.2) |
Discordant penicillin MIC results | 5 (11.1) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 3 (6.7) |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 2 (4.4) |
Discordant tetracycline MIC results | 3 (6.7) |
Urethral MIC higher than rectal MIC | 3 (6.7) |
Rectal MIC higher than urethral MIC | 0 |
Discordant indicates that the difference between the rectal MIC and the urethral MIC was ≥2 doubling dilutions.