TABLE 7.
Adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dietary pattern intake for 722 African Americans in the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study
Minimal Modela |
Full Modelb |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary pattern | No. Cases/No. Controls | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
“Western-Southern” pattern | |||||
Tertile 1 | 73/144 | 1.0 (Ref) | 1.0 (Ref) | ||
Tertile 2 | 92/145 | 1.1 | 0.7–1.7 | 1.0 | 0.6–1.6 |
Tertile 3 | 125/143 | 1.1 | 0.6–1.8 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.5 |
P for trendc | 0.78 | 0.67 | |||
“Fruit-vegetable” pattern | |||||
Tertile 1 | 86/144 | 1.0 (Ref) | 1.0 (Ref) | ||
Tertile 2 | 117/145 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.3 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.3 |
Tertile 3 | 87/143 | 1.1 | 0.7–1.6 | 1.1 | 0.7–1.6 |
P for trendc | 0.78 | 0.78 | |||
“Metropolitan” pattern | |||||
Tertile 1 | 105/144 | 1.0 (Ref) | 1.0 (Ref) | ||
Tertile 2 | 102/145 | 0.9 | 0.6–1.3 | 0.9 | 0.6–1.4 |
Tertile 3 | 83/143 | 0.6 | 0.4–1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5–1.1 |
P for trendc | 0.03 | 0.10 |
Models adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, and offset term. Abbreviation is as follows: Ref, reference.
Models adjusted for preceding variables and education, first-degree family history of colon cancer, physical activity, vitamin/mineral use, and BMI 1 yr ago for Pattern 1, none for Pattern 2, and education for Pattern 3.
P value for trend was obtained for each pattern by including the tertile variable in the model as a continuous term.