Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2009;61(2):179–193. doi: 10.1080/01635580802419806

TABLE 7.

Adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dietary pattern intake for 722 African Americans in the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study

Minimal Modela
Full Modelb
Dietary pattern No. Cases/No. Controls OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
“Western-Southern” pattern
    Tertile 1 73/144 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
    Tertile 2 92/145 1.1 0.7–1.7 1.0 0.6–1.6
    Tertile 3 125/143 1.1 0.6–1.8 0.9 0.5–1.5
    P for trendc 0.78 0.67
“Fruit-vegetable” pattern
    Tertile 1 86/144 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
    Tertile 2 117/145 1.5 1.1–2.3 1.5 1.1–2.3
    Tertile 3 87/143 1.1 0.7–1.6 1.1 0.7–1.6
    P for trendc 0.78 0.78
“Metropolitan” pattern
    Tertile 1 105/144 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
    Tertile 2 102/145 0.9 0.6–1.3 0.9 0.6–1.4
    Tertile 3 83/143 0.6 0.4–1.0 0.7 0.5–1.1
    P for trendc 0.03 0.10
a

Models adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, and offset term. Abbreviation is as follows: Ref, reference.

b

Models adjusted for preceding variables and education, first-degree family history of colon cancer, physical activity, vitamin/mineral use, and BMI 1 yr ago for Pattern 1, none for Pattern 2, and education for Pattern 3.

c

P value for trend was obtained for each pattern by including the tertile variable in the model as a continuous term.