Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Graph Stat. 2012 Jan 1;19(4):930–946. doi: 10.1198/jcgs.2010.08127

Table 3.

Numerical results for the pitprops example.

PC 1 PC 2 PC 3



Variables PCA SPCA SFPCA PCA SPCA SFPCA PCA SPCA SFPCA
topdiam 0.404 0.477 0.408 0.218 −0.207
length 0.406 0.476 0.408 0.186 −0.235
moist 0.124 0.541 0.785 0.707 0.141
testsg 0.173 0.456 0.620 0.707 0.352
ovensg 0.057 −0.177 −0.170 0.481 0.640 0.707
ringtop 0.284 0.052 −0.014 0.475 0.589 0.707
ringbut 0.400 0.250 0.408 −0.190 0.253 0.492
bowmax 0.294 0.344 0.408 −0.189 -0.021 -0.243
bowdist 0.357 0.416 0.408 0.017 -0.208
whorls 0.379 0.400 0.408 −0.248 -0.119
clear −0.011 0.205 -0.070
knots −0.115 0.343 0.013 0.092 −0.015
diaknot −0.113 0.309 −0.326 −0.308519
AV (%) 32.4 28.0 31.5 18.3 14.4 15.1 14.4 13.3 10.1
ACV (%) 32.4 28.0 31.5 50.7 42.0 46.6 65.1 55.3 56.7
PC 4 PC 5 PC 6



topdiam −0.091 0.083 0.120
length −0.103 0.113 0.163
moist 0.078 −0.350 −0.276
testsg 0.055 −0.356 −0.054
ovensg 0.049 −0.176 0.626
ringtop -0.063 0.316 0.052
ringbut −0.065 0.215 0.003
bowmax 0.286 −0.185 −0.055
bowdist 0.097 0.106 0.034
whorls −0.205 −0.156 −0.173
clear 0.804 1.000 1.000 0.343 0.175
knots −0.301 0.600 1.000 1.000 −0.170
diaknot −0.303 −0.08 0.626 1.000 1.000
AV (%) 8.5 7.4 8.0 7.0 6.8 7.3 6.3 6.2 7.0
ACV (%) 73.6 62.7 64.7 80.6 69.5 72.0 86.9 75.8 79.0