Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2014 Mar 10;11(2):024001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/024001

Figure 3. Aggregate analysis of animals’ BCI performance.

Figure 3

(A) Trial success rates from onset of performance period to end of session, for all testing sessions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Trials with active neural cursor feedback (Actual) showed significantly higher hit rates than Bootstrap chance (**, p = 0.0054, paired-sample two-tailed t-test).

(B) Mean time to success during task performance in same trials and sessions as (A). Times are normalized by the maximum allowed duration (after which the trial times out). Error bars represent standard error of the mean, and the Bootstrap error bar is very small and thus not visible above the mean. Performance with active cursor is significantly faster than chance (*, p=0.017, two-sided K-S test).