Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0124048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124048

Table 3. Scoring and distribution (%) of mild and advanced glomerular lesions in the groups under study.

Mild Lesions 0 Absent 1 <25% 2 25–50% 3 >50% Total Score
Thickening of Bowman´s Capsule Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 0 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 1 (14.3%) 3 (42.9%) 1 (14.3%) 2 (28.6%) 1.57±0.43**
Hyalinosis of the vascular pole Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%) 0 0 0.86±0.14**
Glomerular atrophy Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 0 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 1 (14,3%) 6 (85.7%) 0 0 0.86±0.14**
Hypercellularity Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 0 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 0 7 (100%) 0 0 1.00±0.00**
Dilatation of the Bowman’s Space Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 0 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 5 (71.4%) 2 (28.6%) 0 0 0.29±0.18
Total Group Score Sham 0.00±0.00
CRF 0.91±0.12***
Advanced lesions None of the previous (0) Thickening of GBM(1) Mesangial expansion(2) Nodular sclerosis(3) Global Glomerulosclerosis (4) Total Score
Sham, n (%) 7 (100%) 0 0 0 0 0.00±0.00
CRF, n (%) 0 1 (14.3%) 5 (71.4%) 1 (14.3%) 0 2.0±0.22**

Results are presented as mean ± SEM: *- p < 0.05

**- p < 0.01, and

***- p < 0.001 versus Sham group.