Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0122812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122812

Table 4. The outputs of SNPer for the eight fragments of the three different IFVs (“summary.csv”).

samples_table sp1 sp2 sp3 all only_sp1 only_sp2 only_sp3 only_sp1_sp2 only_sp2_sp3 only_sp3_sp1
AF1_HA_vs_AF2_HA_vs_AF6_HA 27 22 29 12 6 10 8 0 0 9
AF1_M_vs_AF2_M_vs_AF6_M 8 6 7 4 1 2 0 0 0 3
AF1_NA_vs_AF2_NA_vs_AF6_NA 13 12 16 5 3 6 5 0 1 5
AF1_NEP_vs_AF2_NEP_vs_AF6_NEP 5 4 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 3
AF1_NP_vs_AF2_NP_vs_AF6_NP 11 9 10 3 3 6 2 0 0 5
AF1_PA_vs_AF2_PA_vs_AF6_PA 15 8 18 3 3 5 6 0 0 9
AF1_PB1_vs_AF2_PB1_vs_AF6_PB1 18 21 21 9 3 11 5 0 1 6
AF1_PB2_vs_AF2_PB2_vs_AF6_PB2 31 16 26 11 7 5 2 0 0 13

Each row shows the number of SNPs of VIROAF1 (sp1), VIROAF2 (sp2) and VIROAF6 (sp3) for each fragment after comparison by SNPer. For example, in the first row, the HA fragment contains 27 SNPs in VIROAF1, 22 SNPs in VIROAF2 and 29 SNPs in VIROAF6. Twelve universal SNPs are in VIROAF1, VIROAF2, and VIROAF6. There are six SNPs in only VIROAF1, 10 SNPs in only VIROAF2 and eight SNPs in only VIROAF6. Only nine SNPs exist in both VIROAF6 and VIROAF1.(1)