Table 2. Rate of decline in physical performance by baseline impairment status.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slope | P value | Slope | P value | Slope | P value | |
Intercept | 30.32 | <0.001 | 46.70 | <0.001 | 10.40 | <0.001 |
Overall decline | -0.76 | <0.001 | -0.50 | <0.001 | -0.70 | <0.001 |
Baseline impairment | ||||||
NI | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
PI | -7.25 | <0.001 | -5.59 | <0.001 | 0.04 | 0.912 |
CI | -1.07 | 0.036 | -1.16 | 0.021 | -0.58 | 0.138 |
CPI | -8.42 | <0.001 | -6.92 | <0.001 | -0.71 | 0.102 |
Baseline impairment*Time | ||||||
NI * Time | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
PI * Time | -0.29 | 0.164 | -0.28 | 0.158 | -0.25 | 0.294 |
CI * Time | -1.03 | <0.001 | -0.98 | <0.001 | -1.22 | <0.001 |
CPI * Time | -1.09 | <0.001 | -1.04 | <0.001 | -1.17 | <0.001 |
Notes: baseline impairment status is based on baseline PPT score (score of <28 being used as indication of physical impairment). NI = not impaired, PI = physically impaired but cognitively normal, CI = cognitively impaired but physically normal; CPI = cognitively and physically impaired; Performance on the PPT (score) was also used to measure decline in physical function; Model 1 = unadjusted; Model 2 = Model 1 + age + gender + education + race; Model 3 = Model 2 + baseline total PPT score; Rates of decline in physical performance were higher in the CI and CPI groups than in the NI (reference) group. No significant differences were observed in the PI group compared with the NI group.