Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123266

Table 5. Comparison of CTRFIA and HPLC methods for AFB1 in food and feed samples.

Sample No. Result by HPLC (μg/kg) Results by CTRFIA (μg/kg) RSD(%) Recover(%)
1 2 3 Mean
Peanut 1 5.2 4.7 5.4 5.3 5.1 7.4 98.7
2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 5.6 86.1
3 7.6 7.2 7.3 7.9 7.5 5.1 98.2
4 15.5 15.5 17.1 16.9 16.5 5.3 106.5
5 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 7.9 91.7
Corn 1 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 9.1 105.6
2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 5.6 93.9
3 5.2 5.2 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.5 106.4
4 9.1 9.6 9.0 9.5 9.4 3.4 102.9
5 7.5 7.5 7.9 8.1 7.8 3.9 104.4
Soy sauce 1 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. - -
2 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 8.7 95.2
3 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 98.7
4 3.8 3.8 3.4 3.8 3.7 6.3 96.5
5 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.8 4.6 4.5 98.6
Vegetable oil 1 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. - -
2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 3.9 97.8
3 5.4 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.3 4.8 97.5
4 8.4 8.4 9.0 8.6 8.7 3.5 103.2
5 12.2 12.0 13.4 12.3 12.6 5.9 103.0
Mouse feed 1 8.8 9.0 9.1 8.8 9.0 1.7 101.9
2 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.0 6.0 2.5 102.3
3 19.7 20.5 20.4 21.3 20.7 2.4 105.2
4 25.4 26.3 26.1 24.5 25.6 3.8 100.9
5 42.3 43.2 44.0 42.4 43.2 1.9 102.1

n.d. is short for "not detected."