Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015 Jan 24;29(5):421–439. doi: 10.1007/s10822-015-9831-x

Table 5.

True positive rates (TPRs) for each Protein Data Bank (PDB) structure in the training phase expressed as percentages. Successful poses were those that satisfied the RMSD cutoff of 2.0 Å. The original TPRs were calculated with the PDB ligands, and the adjusted TPRs were calculated using the subset of ligands that matched the rosiglitazone-based pharmacophore model. The percent change was calculated as the difference between the original and adjusted TPRs divided by the original value

PDB ID Original TPR Adjusted TPR Percent change PDB ID Original TPR Adjusted TPR Percent change
1FM6 7.29 10.64 45.90 2Q5P 4.17 6.38 53.19
1FM9 12.50 17.02 36.17 2Q5S 3.13 2.13 -31.91
1K74 17.71 21.28 20.15 2Q6R 4.17 2.13 -48.94
1RDT 18.75 21.28 13.48 2Q6S 4.17 0.00 -100.00
1WM0 10.42 2.13 -79.57 2VSR 12.50 14.89 19.15
1ZGY 13.54 21.28 57.12 2VST 4.17 6.38 53.19
2OM9 5.21 4.26 -18.30 2VV0 11.46 12.77 11.41
2FVJ 8.33 8.51 2.13 2VV1 8.33 8.51 2.13
2G0G 9.38 17.02 81.56 2VV2 4.17 4.26 2.13
2G0H 5.21 10.64 104.26 3B3K 4.17 6.38 53.19
2HFP 3.13 4.26 36.17 3CDP 2.08 2.13 2.13
2I4J 10.42 6.38 -38.72 3CS8 7.29 2.13 -70.82
2I4P 10.42 6.38 -38.72 3DZU 4.17 0.00 -100.00
2I4Z 9.38 8.51 -9.22 3DZY 4.17 6.38 53.19
2P4Y 5.21 4.26 -18.30 3E00 6.25 10.64 70.21
2POB 15.63 21.28 36.17 4PRG 4.17 4.26 2.13
2PRG 10.42 21.28 104.26