Table 1.
Sources for all unique hypotheses of molluscan phylogeny (including at least five of eight classes), representing the first instance a given topology appeared in the literature. (1) This figure included a polytomy (Kano 2012 figure 4); the authors published a second, explicitly less-preferred tree with the polytomy resolved (Kano 2012 figure 5), which we added to tree dissimilarity analysis but otherwise excluded; (2) http://palaeos.com/metazoa/mollusca/mollusca.htm (content by M. Alan Kazlev 2007; archived at http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.palaeos.com; (3) http://www.pearl-guide.com/pearl-producing-mollusks.shtml (content by Jeremy Sheperd ca. 2007); (4) http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/taxa/inverts/mollusca/mollusca.php
| Source | Data type | Generalized topology | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brusca and Brusca 2002, fig 20.55 | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Dogelya 1940, schema 7 | morphology | Testaria | * |
| Dogelya 1940, schema 1 | morphology | Aculifera | |
| Dogelya 1940, schema 2 | morphology | Aculifera | |
| Dogelya 1940, schema 5 | morphology | Testaria | * |
| Dunn et al. 2008, figure 1 | molecular | other | |
| Giribet et al. 2006, figure 2 | molecular | other (Serialia) | (S) |
| Götting 1980, p. 25 | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Gubanov 1998, figure 1 | morphology | other | |
| Haszprunar 2000, figure 2 | morphology | Testaria | |
| Iijima et al. 2006, figure 2 (Hox5a clade) | molecular | other | * |
| Kano 2012, figure 4 [1] | molecular | other (Serialia) | |
| Kocot et al. 2011, figure 2 | molecular | Aculifera | (C) |
| Lieb and Todt 2008, figure 2 | molecular | other (∼Aculifera) | |
| Naef 1926, p. 99 | morphology | Aculifera | * |
| Palaeos.com [online only 2] | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Passamaneck et al. 2004, figure 2 (minimum evolution) | molecular | other | |
| Passamaneck et al. 2004, figure 6A (maximum parsimony) | molecular | other | * |
| Passamaneck et al. 2004, figure 6B (maximum likelihood) | molecular | other | (S) |
| Pearl-Guide.com [online only 3] | morphology | other | * |
| Peel 1991, figure 46 | morphology | Testaria | |
| Runnegar 1996, figure 6.5 | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Runnegar and Pojeta 1974, figure 1 | morphology | other | |
| Runnegar and Pojeta 1974, figure 4 | morphology | other | |
| “Runnegar and Pojeta 1974” as reproduced in Runnegar 1996, figure 6.1B | morphology | other | * |
| Salvini-Plawen and Steiner 1996 figure 2.4 | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Salvini-Plawen 1985 figure 42 | morphology | Testaria | (C) |
| Salvini-Plawen 2006, figure 14 after Haszprunar and Wanninger 2000 | morphology | Testaria | * |
| Scheltema 1993, figure 12 | morphology | Aculifera | * |
| Sigwart and Sutton 2007, figure 1b | morphology | Testaria | * |
| Smith et al. 2011, figure 2 | molecular | Aculifera | (C) |
| Steiner and Reynolds 2003, figure 3A | morphology | other | |
| Stoeger et al., in press | molecular | other (Serialia) | (S) |
| UCMP molluscan phylogeny [online only 4], after Sigwart and Sutton 2007 | morphology | Aculifera | * |
| Vinther et al. 2012, figure 3 | molecular | other (∼Aculifera) | (C) |
| Wägele et al. 2009, figure 5 | molecular | other | |
| Waller 1998, figure 1 | morphology | Testaria | |
| “Waller 1998” as reproduced in as reproduced in Lindberg et al. 2004, figure 16.5 | morphology | other | |
| Wilson et al. 2010, figure 1 | molecular | other (Serialia) | (S) |
| Winnepenninckx et al. 1996, figure 4a (excluding heterodont bivalves) | molecular | other | (S) |
| Yochelson 1978, figure 1 | morphology | other (∼Serialia) | * |
| Yu 1990, text-figure 6 | morphology | Testaria | * |
Notes: *Trees including polytomies that were excluded from tree dissimilarity analyses; mutually significantly similar trees in two clusters are noted (C) Conchifera, or (S) Serialia.