Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 2;64(3):384–395. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu105

Table 2.

Parameters and results of supertree analyses

Partition (# of trees) Analysis Reps # of trees Program score Recovered tree (as labeled in Fig. 3) Software
Molecular (15 trees) DFIT All trees 1 1439 d Clann 3.0
SFIT All trees 1 1439 d Clann 3.0
AVCON n/a 1 n/a a Clann 3.0
QFIT All trees 1 5.54 d Clann 3.0
RF 50 38 79 b (strict), d (majority rule) RF-Supertrees 2.0
MRF 90 1 47 flips c Rainbow 0.3
MRP 90 2 140 steps e, f Rainbow 0.3
Morphology (27 trees) DFIT All trees 1 21.52 g Clann 3.0
SFIT All trees 1 20.25 g Clann 3.0
AVCON n/a 1 n/a h Clann 3.0
QFIT All trees 1 4.91 g Clann 3.0
RF 50 51 103 g (strict and majority rule) RF-Supertrees 2.0
MRF 90 1 41 flips g Rainbow 0.3
MRP 90 1 207 steps g Rainbow 0.3

Notes: “Reps” refers to the number of random addition sequences performed by Rainbow 0.3 and the number of ratchet search iterations performed by RF-Supertrees; program scores are those reported by each of the respective software programs.

DFIT = most similar supertrees; SFIT = maximum split fit; AVCON = average consensus; QFIT = maximum quartet fit; RF = Robinson–Foulds distance; MRF = matrix representation with flipping; MRF = matrix representation with parsimony.