Table 2.
Factor | OS | RFS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Univariate P | Hazard Ratio | Multivariate 95% CI | P | Univariate P | Hazard Ratio | Multivariate 95% CI | P | |
Gender (male vs. female) | 0.120 | NA | 0.102 | NA | ||||
Age (≤ 54 years vs. > 54 years) | 0.265 | NA | 0.542 | NA | ||||
AFP (≤ 20 ng/ml vs. > 20 ng/ml) | 0.053 | NA | 0.070 | NA | ||||
Thrumbi (No vs. Yes) | <.001 | 1.920 | 1.013-3.639 | 0.046 | 0.004 | 1.246 | 0.700-2.218 | 0.455 |
Tumor size (≤ 5 cm vs. > 5 cm) | 0.002 | 1.628 | 0.795-3.335 | 0.182 | 0.006 | 1.697 | 0.909-3.167 | 0.097 |
Tumor number (Singer vs. Multiple) | 0.323 | NA | 0.378 | NA | ||||
Encapsulation (Complete vs. None) | 0.01 | 1.409 | 0.846-2.656 | 0.166 | 0.005 | 1.772 | 1.041-3.015 | 0.035 |
Edmondson Stage (I/II vs. III/IV) | 0.276 | NA | 0.064 | NA | ||||
TNM stage (I/II vs. III) | < .001 | 2.296 | 1.238-4.260 | 0.008 | 0.004 | 1.557 | 0.862-2.883 | 0.139 |
Dynamin2 (Low vs. High) | 0.017 | 0.539 | 0.317-0.917 | 0.023 | 0.089 | 0.660 | 0.399-1.092 | NA |
Abbreviations: CI indcates confidence interval; TNM, tumor, node, metastasis;
Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Multivariate analysis, The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the multivariate analysis. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis and no obvious correlation between each other.