Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 15;5(2):702–713.

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated With Recurrence and Survival*

Factor OS RFS

Univariate P Hazard Ratio Multivariate 95% CI P Univariate P Hazard Ratio Multivariate 95% CI P
Gender (male vs. female) 0.120 NA 0.102 NA
Age (≤ 54 years vs. > 54 years) 0.265 NA 0.542 NA
AFP (≤ 20 ng/ml vs. > 20 ng/ml) 0.053 NA 0.070 NA
Thrumbi (No vs. Yes) <.001 1.920 1.013-3.639 0.046 0.004 1.246 0.700-2.218 0.455
Tumor size (≤ 5 cm vs. > 5 cm) 0.002 1.628 0.795-3.335 0.182 0.006 1.697 0.909-3.167 0.097
Tumor number (Singer vs. Multiple) 0.323 NA 0.378 NA
Encapsulation (Complete vs. None) 0.01 1.409 0.846-2.656 0.166 0.005 1.772 1.041-3.015 0.035
Edmondson Stage (I/II vs. III/IV) 0.276 NA 0.064 NA
TNM stage (I/II vs. III) < .001 2.296 1.238-4.260 0.008 0.004 1.557 0.862-2.883 0.139
Dynamin2 (Low vs. High) 0.017 0.539 0.317-0.917 0.023 0.089 0.660 0.399-1.092 NA

Abbreviations: CI indcates confidence interval; TNM, tumor, node, metastasis;

*

Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Multivariate analysis, The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the multivariate analysis. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis and no obvious correlation between each other.