Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;3:5. doi: 10.1186/s40349-015-0026-7

Table 2.

Occurrence rates and hampering rates of the MRT artifacts in % of the total number of datasets per treatment

Treatment number Location Lesion type Time-varying field inhomogeneities Arterial ghosting Patient motion
Respiratory Non-Respiratory Muscle contraction Body movement
1a,d Femur Osteolytic 0 0 0 0 100 0 15 0 0 0
2a,d Femur Osteolytic 0 0 100 0 100 0 14 0 0 0
3a Sacrum Osteolytic 100 100 100 0 0 0 43 29 0 0
4a Pubic bone Mixed 82 64 100 82 100 82 91 73 0 0
5b Pubic bone Osteolytic 69 38 100 0 100 0 6.3 6.3 13 13
6b,e Sacrum Mixed 100 100 100 0 100 0 38 31 54 54
7b Shoulder Osteoblastic 100 100 97 9.7 100 3.2 39 35 35 35
8c Rib Mixed 100 100 100 0 100 20 10 10 0 0
9b,e,f Sacrum Mixed 100 100 100 0 83 0 17 17 39 39
10c,f Pubic bone Osteolytic 100 100 100 33 100 0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
11c Pubic bone Osteolytic 70 65 100 22 96 35 22 17 13 13
12c Rib Mixed 100 100 100 100 100 67 53 47 33 33
13c Rib Osteolytic 100 100 100 56 100 0 11 11 0 0
Total 85 81 94 23 95 14 25 21 17 17

The occurrence rates are shown in normal font, the hampering rates in italic font.

aPerformed under PSA type A (fentanyl and midazolam).

bPerformed under PSA type B (propofol and opioid analgesic).

cPerformed under PSA type C (propofol and esketamine).

dSame patient, retreated after 2 weeks, metal internal fixation material in the target region.

eSame patient, retreated after 4.5 months.

fHigher resolution MRT scans used.