Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 14;7:48. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00048

Table 7A.

One-way ANOVA testing for differences in the classification performances across different GLRAM dimension parameters for nine tractography algorithms in three diagnostic tasks.

Degrees of freedom AD vs. NC
AD vs. MCI
MCI vs. NC
F Sig. F Sig. F Sig.
Tensor-FACT Between groups 6 1.790 0.106 0.662 0.681 1.457 0.198
Within groups 133
Tensor-RK2 Between groups 6 1.299 0.262 0.564 0.759 2.438 0.029
Within groups 133
Tensor-SL Between groups 6 1.445 0.202 0.403 0.876 3.010 0.009
Within groups 133
Tensor-TL Between groups 6 2.169 0.049 1.094 0.369 1.590 0.155
Within groups 133
ODF-FACT Between groups 6 0.384 0.888 2.540 0.023 1.398 0.220
Within groups 133
ODF-RK2 Between groups 6 1.824 0.099 0.523 0.790 1.930 0.080
Within groups 133
Probtrackx Between groups 6 1.385 0.225 3.800 0.002 0.817 0.559
Within groups 133
PICo Between groups 6 0.178 0.982 0.448 0.845 0.314 0.929
Within groups 133
Hough Between groups 6 0.536 0.780 0.661 0.681 1.083 0.376
Within groups 133

Since we have seven possible dimension parameters (5–35), the degrees of freedom for Between Groups is 7-1 = 6. Moreover, since we have 20 splits for each setting of the dimension parameter, the number of degrees of freedom for the Within Groups comparison is 20x7-7 = 133. Thus, the critical F-value = 2.1674 at the α = 0.05 level, when the number of degrees of freedom = (6,133). Our H0 is that there is no significant difference among different dimension parameters. We were able to reject H0 at the nominal significance level when our computed F-value > 2.1674; this included the cases where tensor-TL was used for the task AD vs. NC; ODF-FACT and Probtrackx in task AD vs. MCI; tensor-RK2, SL in task MCI vs. NC. However, three of these cases – including tensor-TL in the task AD vs. NC, ODF-FACT for the task AD vs. MCI, and tensor-RK2 for the task MCI vs. NC – did not pass the Bonferroni correction in the post hoc comparisons. There are therefore no significant differences in the classification performance when changing the dimension parameters in these three cases. We marked the other two cases in red and the corresponding post hoc results for these situations are shown in (B).