Table 4.
CpG_1 | CpG_2.3.4.5 | CpG_6 | CpG_12.13.14 | CpG_15 | CpG_16.17 | CpG_18.19 | CpG_20 | CpG_21.22 | CpG_23 | CpG_24.25.26 | CpG_31 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lesion grades (r) | Uygur | 0.288*** | 0.304 | 0.108 | 0.266* | 0.404*** | 0.247 | 0.413*** | 0.348** | 0.301* | 0.306** | 0.231 | 0.456*** |
Han | 0.204* | 0.118 | 0.059 | 0.164 | 0.058 | 0.239* | -0.007 | 0.281** | 0.299** | 0.191* | 0.09 | 0.249** |
Note: Uygur cohort has a stronger correlation between CpG site and lesion grade. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the relationship between CpG site and lesion grade. R value is correlation coefficient.
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.